Evaluating calcium channel blockers and bisphosphonates as otoprotective agents in cochlear implantation hearing preservation candidates.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate potential effects of calcium channel blockers (CCB) and bisphosphonates (BP) on residual hearing following cochlear implantation. METHODS: Medications of 303 adult hearing preservation (HP) candidates (low frequency pure tone average [LFPTA] of 125, 250, and 500 Hz ≤80 dB HL) were reviewed. Postimplantation LFPTA of patients taking CCBs and BPs were compared to controls matched by age and preimplantation LFPTA. RESULTS: Twenty-six HP candidates were taking a CCB (N = 14) or bisphosphonate (N = 12) at implantation. Median follow-up was 1.37 years (range 0.22-4.64y). Among subjects with initial HP, 29% (N = 2 of 7) CCB users compared to 50% (N = 2 of 4) controls subsequently lost residual hearing 3-6 months later (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.04-4.32, p = 0.58). None of the four BP patients with initial HP experienced delayed loss compared to 50% (N = 2 of 4) controls with initial HP (OR = 0.00, 95% CI = 0.00-1.95, P = 0.43). Two CCB and one BP patients improved to a LFPTA <80 dB HL following initial unaided thresholds that suggested loss of residual hearing. DISCUSSION: There were no significant differences in the odds of delayed loss of residual hearing with CCBs or BPs. CONCLUSION: Further investigation into potential otoprotective adjuvants for maintaining residual hearing following initial successful hearing preservation is warranted, with larger cohorts and additional CCB/BP agents.

Improved Postoperative Speech Recognition and Processor Use With Early Cochlear Implant Activation.

OBJECTIVE: To report speech recognition outcomes and processor use based on timing of cochlear implant (CI) activation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 604 adult CI recipients from October 2011 to March 2022, stratified by timing of CI activation (group 1: ≤10 d, n = 47; group 2: >10 d, n = 557). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Average daily processor use; Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) and Arizona Biomedical (AzBio) in quiet at 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month visits; time to peak performance. RESULTS: The groups did not differ in sex ( p = 0.887), age at CI ( p = 0.109), preoperative CNC ( p = 0.070), or preoperative AzBio in quiet ( p = 0.113). Group 1 had higher median daily processor use than group 2 at the 1-month visit (12.3 versus 10.7 h/d, p = 0.017), with no significant differences at 3, 6, and 12 months. The early activation group had superior median CNC performance at 3 months (56% versus 46%, p = 0.007) and 12 months (60% versus 52%, p = 0.044). Similarly, the early activation group had superior median AzBio in quiet performance at 3 months (72% versus 59%, p = 0.008) and 12 months (75% versus 68%, p = 0.049). Both groups were equivalent in time to peak performance for CNC and AzBio. Earlier CI activation was significantly correlated with higher average daily processor use at all follow-up intervals. CONCLUSION: CI activation within 10 days of surgery is associated with increased early device usage and superior speech recognition at both early and late follow-up visits. Timing of activation and device usage are modifiable factors that can help optimize postoperative outcomes in the CI population.

#OtoTwitter: The Top 75 Twitter Influencers in Otolaryngology and Association With Academic Impact.

OBJECTIVES: Social media has enabled discussion of relevant topics within otolaryngology. With increasing academic discourse occurring on virtual platforms, it is important to examine who is influencing these discussions. This study thus aims to: (1) identify the top Twitter influencers in otolaryngology and (2) assess the relationship between Twitter influence and academic impact. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: Twitter. METHODS: The Right Relevance program was used to identify and rank the top 75 Twitter influencers, excluding organizations, according to the search terms "otolaryngology," "head and neck surgery," "ear nose throat," "rhinology," "head and neck," "laryngology," "facial plastics," and "otology." Demographic data and h-index were collected for each influencer. Correlational analyzes were performed to assess the relationships between Twitter rank and geographic location, sex, subspecialty, and h-index. RESULTS: The majority of the top 75 influencers were otolaryngologists (87%), female (68%), and located in the United States (61%). General otolaryngology (n = 20, 31%) was more well-represented than any individual subspecialty including facial plastics (n = 10, 15%), rhinology (n = 10, 15%), and neurotology (n = 9, 14%). There was a significant relationship between Twitter rank and h-index (Spearman ρ value of -0.32; 95% confidence interval: -0.51 to -0.01; P = .006). Twitter rank was not significantly correlated with subspecialty, sex, or geographic location (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The majority of Twitter influencers within otolaryngology were otolaryngologists, female, and located in the United States. Social media influence is positively associated with academic impact among otolaryngologists.

Endoscopic Versus Microscopic Transcanal Resection of Glomus Tympanicum: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of outcomes of microscopic and endoscopic resection of glomus tympanicum (GT) tumors. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Single tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All adult patients undergoing transcanal GT resection without mastoidectomy from 2007 to 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Surgical resection-endoscopic versus microscopic approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were tumor recurrence at 1 year and presence of residual tumor at conclusion of surgery. Secondary outcome measures included operative time, postoperative air-bone gap, postoperative symptom resolution, and surgical complications. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients underwent resection of GT (74% female; mean age, 59 years). Twenty-nine cases were performed microscopically, and nine cases were performed endoscopically. Both endoscopic and microscopic approaches yielded high rates of complete tumor resection (27/29 microscopic cases, 7/9 endoscopic cases). There was no significant difference in mean operative time (2.3 hours for microscopic; 2.6 hours for endoscopic). On average, air-bone gaps (ABGs) decreased by 6.3 dB after endoscopic resection compared with 1.0 dB after microscopic resection ( p = 0.064). No patients were found to have tumor recurrence during an average follow-up interval of 21 months. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest comparable outcomes with both endoscopic and microscopic approaches for GT resection, and decisions regarding preferred approach should be dictated by surgeon preference.

Cochlear Implant Qualification in Noise Versus Quiet: Do Patients Demonstrate Similar Postoperative Benefits?

OBJECTIVE: To assess patient factors, audiometric performance, and patient-reported outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) patients who would not have qualified with in-quiet testing alone. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. METHODS: Adult CI recipients implanted between 2012 and 2022 were identified. Patients with preoperative AzBio Quiet > 60% in the implanted ear, requiring multitalker babble to qualify, comprised the in-noise qualifying (NQ) group. NQ postoperative performance was compared with the in-quiet qualifying (QQ) group using CNC, AzBio Quiet, and AzBio +5 dB signal-to-noise ratio. Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ), Cochlear Implant Quality of Life scale (CIQOL-10), and daily device usage were also compared between the groups. RESULTS: The QQ group (n = 771) and NQ group (n = 67) were similar in age and hearing loss duration. NQ had higher average preoperative and postoperative speech recognition scores. A larger proportion of QQ saw significant improvement in CNC and AzBio Quiet scores in the CI-only listening condition (eg, CI-only AzBio Quiet: 88% QQ vs 51% NQ, P < .001). Improvement in CI-only AzBio +5 dB and in all open set testing in the best-aided binaural listening condition was similar between groups (eg, Binaural AzBio Quiet 73% QQ vs 59% NQ, P = .345). Postoperative SSQ ratings, CIQOL scores, and device usage were also equivalent between both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients who require in-noise testing to meet CI candidacy demonstrate similar improvements in best-aided speech perception and patient-reported outcomes as in-QQ, supporting the use of in-noise testing to determine CI qualification for borderline CI candidates.

Comparison of Speech Recognition and Hearing Preservation Outcomes Between the Mid-Scala and Lateral Wall Electrode Arrays.

OBJECTIVE: To assess speech recognition and hearing preservation (HP) outcomes with the Advanced Bionics Mid-Scala and SlimJ electrodes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 237 adult patients implanted between 2013 and 2020 (Mid-Scala, n = 136; SlimJ, n = 101). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) and AzBio (Arizona Biomedical) scores at 6 and 12 months; postoperative HP, defined as low-frequency pure-tone average ≤ 80 dB HL; scalar position. RESULTS: Mean CNC scores did not significantly differ between Mid-Scala and SlimJ recipients at 6 (45.8% versus 46.0%, p = 0.962) and 12 (51.9% versus 48.8%, p = 0.363) months. Similarly, mean AzBio in quiet scores were equivalent for both groups at 6 (55.1% versus 59.2%, p = 0.334) and 12 (60.6% versus 62.3%, p = 0.684) months. HP rates were significantly higher with the SlimJ (48.4%) than the Mid-Scala (30.8%; p = 0.033). Scalar translocations were 34.8 and 16.1% for the Mid-Scala and SlimJ groups, respectively ( p = 0.019). Ears with postoperative HP had significantly fewer scalar translocations (16.7% versus 37.2%, p = 0.048), and postoperative HP was associated with higher AzBio in noise scores at the most recent follow-up interval (38.7% versus 25.1%, p = 0.042). CNC, AzBio in quiet and noise, low-frequency pure-tone average shifts, and PTA at 6 and 12 months were not significantly different between patients with scala tympani insertions of the SlimJ versus the Mid-Scala ( p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the Mid-Scala, the lateral wall electrode has superior HP rates and fewer scalar translocations, whereas speech recognition scores are equivalent between both electrode arrays. These findings can help providers with electrode selection and patient counseling.

Correlation Between Quality of Life and Speech Recognition Outcomes Following Cochlear Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-10 Global (CIQOL-10) scores and speech recognition scores 6 and 12 months after cochlear implantation (CI) and to compare CIQOL-10 scores for patients who met the benchmark speech recognition scores with those who did not. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred twenty-four adults who underwent CI between 2018 and 2021 and completed a CIQOL-10 questionnaire at their 6- and/or 12-month postoperative visit. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CIQOL-10, Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word, and AzBio in quiet and noise scores. RESULTS: At 6 months, weak positive correlations were found between CIQOL-10 and CNC (n = 78, r = 0.234, p = 0.039) and AzBio in quiet (n = 73, r = 0.293, p = 0.012) scores but not AzBio in noise scores (n = 39, r = 0.207, p = 0.206). At 12 months, weak positive correlations were found between CIQOL-10 and CNC (n = 98, r = 0.315, p = 0.002), AzBio in quiet (n = 88, r = 0.271, p = 0.011), and AzBio in noise (n = 48, r = 0.291, p = 0.045) scores. Patients who met the benchmark CNC scores had notably higher CIQOL-10 scores than those who did not at 6 months (52.0 vs 45.5, p = 0.008) and 12 months (52.0 vs 45.5, p = 0.003). A similar relationship was found for those who met the benchmark AzBio in quiet scores at both 6 months (52.0 vs 44.0, p = 0.006) and 12 months (52.0 vs 46.5, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: CIQOL-10 scores have weak positive correlations with postoperative speech recognition outcomes at 6 and 12 months. This highlights the need for the continued use of quality-of-life measures, such as the CIQOL-10, in assessing CI outcomes to gain a more comprehensive understanding of patients' experiences.

Machine Learning Approach for Screening Cochlear Implant Candidates: Comparing With the 60/60 Guideline.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a machine learning-based referral guideline for patients undergoing cochlear implant candidacy evaluation (CICE) and to compare with the widely used 60/60 guideline. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: 772 adults undergoing CICE from 2015 to 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Variables included demographics, unaided thresholds, and word recognition score. A random forest classification model was trained on patients undergoing CICE, and bootstrap cross-validation was used to assess the modeling approach's performance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The machine learning-based referral tool was evaluated against the 60/60 guideline based on ability to identify CI candidates under traditional and expanded criteria. RESULTS: Of 587 patients with complete data, 563 (96%) met candidacy at our center, and the 60/60 guideline identified 512 (87%) patients. In the random forest model, word recognition score; thresholds at 3000, 2000, and 125; and age at CICE had the largest impact on candidacy (mean decrease in Gini coefficient, 2.83, 1.60, 1.20, 1.17, and 1.16, respectively). The 60/60 guideline had a sensitivity of 0.91, a specificity of 0.42, and an accuracy of 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.91). The random forest model obtained higher sensitivity (0.96), specificity (1.00), and accuracy (0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-0.98). Across 1,000 bootstrapped iterations, the model yielded a median sensitivity of 0.92 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.85-0.98), specificity of 1.00 (IQR, 0.88-1.00), accuracy of 0.93 (IQR, 0.85-0.97), and area under the curve of 0.96 (IQR, 0.93-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: A novel machine learning-based screening model is highly sensitive, specific, and accurate in predicting CI candidacy. Bootstrapping confirmed that this approach is potentially generalizable with consistent results.

Bilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis in a Patient With Congenital MYOD1 Myopathy.

Congenital bilateral vocal fold paralysis (BVFP) is a rare but significant cause of morbidity in pediatric otolaryngology. The differential diagnosis is expansive, with common etiologies including birth trauma, brainstem neoplasms, and neurologic disorders. There are few known genetic causes of the condition. This report details the first known case of BVFP secondary to a genetic deficiency in MYOD1, a master transcriptional regulator of skeletal muscle cell specification. Genetics consultation and testing may be a useful adjunct in the workup of congenital BVFP and may help guide prognostication, additional workup, counseling, and clinical decision-making.

Early Datalogging Predicts Cochlear Implant Performance: Building a Recommendation for Daily Device Usage.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effect of datalogging on speech recognition scores and time to achievement for a "benchmark" level of performance within the first year, and to provide a data-driven recommendation for minimum daily cochlear implant (CI) device usage to better guide patient counseling and future outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Three hundred thirty-seven adult CI patients with data logging and speech recognition outcome data who were implanted between August 2015 and August 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Processor datalogging, speech recognition scores, achievement of "benchmark speech recognition performance" defined as 80% of the median score for speech recognition outcomes at our institution. RESULTS: The 1-month datalogging measure correlated positively with word and sentences scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postactivation. Compared with age, sex, and preoperative performance, datalogging was the largest predictive factor of benchmark achievement on multivariate analysis. Each hour/day increase of device usage at 1 month resulted in a higher likelihood of achieving benchmark consonant-nucleus-consonant and AzBio scores within the first year (odds ratio = 1.21, p < 0.001) as well as earlier benchmark achievement. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified the optimal data logging threshold at an average of 12 hours/day. CONCLUSIONS: Early CI device usage, as measured by 1-month datalogging, predicts benchmark speech recognition achievement in adults. Datalogging is an important predictor of CI performance within the first year postimplantation. These data support the recommended daily CI processor utilization of at least 12 hours/day to achieve optimal speech recognition performance for most patients.

Cochlear Implantation in Very Young Children With Single-Sided Deafness.

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implants (CIs) for single-sided deafness (SSD) have only been approved for patients 5 years and older despite data supporting that younger children can also benefit from implantation. This study describes our institution's experience with CI for SSD in children 5 years and younger. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. METHODS: A case series with chart review identified 19 patients up to age 5 years who underwent CI for SSD between 2014 and 2022. Baseline characteristics, perioperative complications, device usage, and speech outcomes were collected. RESULTS: The median age at CI was 2.8 (range, 1.0-5.4) years, with 15 (79%) patients being below age 5 at implantation. Etiologies of hearing loss were idiopathic (n = 8), cytomegalovirus (n = 4), enlarged vestibular aqueduct (n = 3), hypoplastic cochlear nerve (n = 3), and meningitis (n = 1). The median preoperative pure-tone average was 90 (range, 75-120) and 20 (range, 5-35) dB eHL in the poor and better hearing ears, respectively. No patients had postoperative complications. Twelve patients achieved consistent device use (average, 9 h/d). Three of the seven who were not consistent users had hypoplastic cochlear nerves and/or developmental delays. The three patients with available preoperative and postoperative speech testing showed significant benefits, and five patients with available postoperative testing demonstrated speech recognition in the implanted ear when isolated from the better ear. CONCLUSION: CI can safely be performed in younger children with SSD. Patients and families accept early implantation, as evidenced by consistent device use, and derive notable benefits in speech recognition. Candidacy can be broadened to include SSD patients under age five years, particularly individuals without hypoplastic cochlear nerves or developmental delay.

Approach to Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts to inform clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centers. METHODS: A multi-institutional historical cohort of patients with VP shunts and CI was identified and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients (median age 8 years [interquratile range, IQR: 2-46]) with VP shunts and CI were identified. Of these, 41 (89%) patients had a VP shunt prior to CI. Based on institutional preference and individual patient factors, CI was performed contralateral to a pre-existing VP shunt in 24 of these 41 cases (59%) and ipsilateral in 17 (41%). Furthermore, pre-CI relocation of the VP shunt was performed in 3 cases (7%), and 2 patients (5%) underwent planned revision of their VP shunt concurrent with CI. In total, 2 of 27 pediatric patients (7%) required unanticipated revision shunt surgery, both contralateral to CI device placement, given VP shunt malfunction. One of 19 adult patients (5%) required shunt revision during CI due to shunt damage noted intraoperatively. Among 43 patients with available follow-up, 38 (88%) are regular CI users, with a median consonant-nucleus vowel-consonant word: score of 58% (IQR: 28-72). CONCLUSION: CI can be performed at low risk, either contralateral or ipsilateral, to a VP shunt, and does not mandate shunt revision in most cases. Additional considerations regarding CI receiver-stimulator placement are necessary with programmable shunts to mitigate device interaction. Preoperative planning, including coordination of care with neurosurgery, is important to achieving optimal outcomes.

Radiographic Sigmoid Sinus Wall Abnormalities and Pulsatile Tinnitus: A Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVE: Compare incidence of sigmoid sinus wall abnormalities (SSWAs) and other radiographic abnormalities in patients with pulsatile tinnitus (PT) versus controls. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Adults with PT and high-resolution computed tomography imaging were compared with adults undergoing cochlear implant workup including high-resolution computed tomography imaging. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of SSWA in PT cohort (n = 141) compared with control (n = 149, n = 298 ears). Secondary outcome measures included differences in demographics and in other radiographic abnormalities between cohorts. RESULTS: Patients with PT had a higher incidence of SSWA (34% versus 9%, p < 0.001) and superior canal dehiscence (23% versus 12%, p = 0.017) than controls. Spearman product component correlations demonstrated that ipsilateral PT was weakly associated with SSWA ( r = 0.354, p < 0.001). When SSWA was present in the PT cohort (n = 48 patients, n = 59 ears), in 31 cases (64.6%), the SSWA correlated with PT laterality (e.g., left SSWA, left PT); in 12 (25.0%), SSWA partially correlated with PT laterality (e.g., bilateral SSWA, right PT); and in 5 (10.4%), the SSWA did not correlate with PT laterality (e.g., right SSWA, left PT). CONCLUSIONS: For our patients with both PT and SSWA, the SSWA is likely a contributing factor in approximately 65% of cases. For a third of patients with PT and concomitant SSWA, the association between the two is either not causative or not solely causative. Surgeons counseling patients with PT and SSWA may be optimistic overall regarding sigmoid resurfacing procedures but must appreciate the possibility of treatment failure, likely because of untreated comorbid conditions.

Cochlear Implants for Single-Sided Deafness: Quality of Life, Daily Usage, and Duration of Deafness.

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience for adults undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) for single-sided deafness (SSD). METHODS: This is a retrospective case series for adults with SSD who underwent CI between January 2013 and May 2021 at our institution. CNC and AzBio speech recognition scores, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12), datalogging, and the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-10 Global measure were utilized. RESULTS: Sixty-six adults underwent CI for SSD (median 51.3 years, range 20.0-74.3 years), and 57 (86.4%) remained device users at last follow-up. Compared to pre-operative performance, device users demonstrated significant improvement in speech recognition scores and achieved peak performance at six months post-activation for CNC (8.0% increased to 45.6%, p < 0.0001) and AzBio in quiet (12.2% increased to 59.5%, p < 0.0001). THI was decreased at 6 months post-implantation (58.1-14.6, p < 0.0001), with 77% of patients reporting improved or resolved tinnitus. Patients demonstrated improved SSQ12 scores as well as the disease-specific CIQOL-10 Global questionnaire. Duration of deafness was not associated with significant differences in speech recognition performance. Average daily wear time was positively associated with CNC and AzBio scores as well as post-operative CIQOL-10 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Herein we present the largest cohort of adult CI recipients with SSD with data on speech recognition scores, tinnitus measures, and SSQ12. Novel insights regarding the correlation of datalogging, duration of deafness, and CI-specific quality of life (CIQOL-10) metrics are discussed. Data continue to support CI as an efficacious treatment option for SSD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:2362-2370, 2023.

Impact of Serial Intralesional Steroid Injections on Idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: Serial intralesional steroid injection (SILSI) has been increasingly used to treat idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS). Prior studies have shown effectiveness, but not in all patients. This multi-institutional study evaluates the effect of SILSI on time to recurrent operation, peak expiratory flow (PEF), and dyspnea. METHODS: Post-hoc secondary analysis of the North American Airway Collaborative data were performed to evaluate the outcomes of iSGS patients undergoing and not undergoing SILSI. The primary outcome was time to recurrent operation, evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. Secondary outcomes were change in PEF and clinical chronic obstructive pulmonary disease questionnaire (CCQ) score. Within patients undergoing SILSI, demographics, time from last procedure, and PEF at initiation of SILSI were evaluated to determine the effect on recurrence. RESULTS: Two hundred and ninety patients were included, 238 undergoing endoscopic dilation alone and 52 undergoing dilation and SILSI. No differences in baseline characteristics were observed. There was no difference in time to recurrence (hazard ratio: 0.64; p = 0.183). There were no differences in PEF or CCQ across the 2.5-year study period. Among 52 patients undergoing SILSI, PEF at the time of starting SILSI did not affect recurrence (χ2  = 0.09, p = 0.77). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing and not undergoing SILSI had similar times to recurrence, PEF, and CCQ. Factors predicting recurrence among patients undergoing SILSI were not identified. These results support a randomized controlled trial with a uniform SILSI protocol to quantify the effects of SILSI on objective and subjective outcomes and help determine which iSGS patients benefit most. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:2255-2263, 2023.

Hearing impairment in children living with HIV in Haiti.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence of hearing impairment and associated risk factors in children living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in Haiti. METHODS: A validated smartphone-based platform with pure-tone audiometry was used to screen 341 HIV-infected children for hearing impairment in Port-au-Prince, Haiti from March 2019 to September 2020. If screening was failed, a more comprehensive pure-tone audiometric evaluation was administered. Demographic, otologic, and HIV-related data were obtained through caregiver surveys and medical charts. Statistical analysis included univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Sixty (18%) of 341 HIV-infected children (ages 7-18 years) had hearing impairment. Of those failing their hearing assessment, 17 (28%) had moderate and 5 (8%) had severe or profound hearing loss. Hearing impairment was associated with frequent ear infections (OR 3.37; 95% CI 1.76-6.46; p < 0.001) and family history of hearing loss (OR 5.12; 95% CI 2.14-12.23; p = 0.001) but not viral load (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.73-1.02; p = 0.28) or antiretroviral therapy duration (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.79-1.17; p = 0.66). Only 35% of caregivers correctly perceived their child's hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing impairment occurs at a higher prevalence in HIV-infected children in Haiti than what is expected for those living without HIV. Frequent ear infections were significantly associated with hearing loss while antiretroviral therapy duration was not. Despite their potential ototoxicity, antiretroviral therapies should be continued and may decrease incidence of otitis media. Low caregiver perception of hearing loss emphasizes the need for routine hearing screening for HIV-infected children.

Speech Recognition Performance Differences Between Precurved and Straight Electrode Arrays From a Single Manufacturer.

OBJECTIVE: Precurved cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays have demonstrated superior audiometric outcomes compared with straight electrodes in a handful of studies. However, previous comparisons have often failed to account for preoperative hearing and age. This study compares hearing outcomes for precurved and straight electrodes by a single manufacturer while controlling for these and other factors in a large cohort. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS: Two hundred thirty-one adult CI recipients between 2015 and 2021 with cochlear (Sydney, Australia) 522/622 (straight) or 532/632 (precurved) electrode arrays. INTERVENTIONS: Postactivation speech recognition and audiometric testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech recognition testing (consonant-nucleus-consonant word [CNCw] and AzBio) was collected at 6 and 12 months postactivation. Hearing preservation was characterized by a low-frequency pure-tone average shift, or the change between preoperative and postoperative low-frequency pure-tone average. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-one patients (253 ears) with 6-month and/or 12-month CNCw or AzBio testing were included. One hundred forty-nine (59%) and 104 (41%) ears were implanted with straight and precurved electrode arrays, respectively. Average age at implantation was 70 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58-77 y). There was no significant difference in mean age between groups. CNCw scores were significantly different ( p = 0.001) between straight (51%; IQR, 36-67%) and precurved arrays (64%; IQR, 48-72%). AzBio scores were not significantly different ( p = 0.081) between straight (72%; IQR, 51-87%) and precurved arrays (81%; IQR, 57-90%). Controlling for age, race, sex, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time, precurved electrode arrays performed significantly better on CNCw (b = 10.0; 95% confidence interval, 4.2-16.0; p < 0.001) and AzBio (b = 8.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-16.0;, p = 0.014) testing. Hearing preservation was not different between electrodes on adjusted models. CONCLUSION: During the study period, patients undergoing placement of precurved electrode arrays had significantly higher CNC and AzBio scores than patients receiving straight electrodes, even after controlling for age, preoperative hearing, and follow-up time. PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GAP AND EDUCATIONAL NEED: Understanding the difference in audiometric outcomes between precurved and straight electrode arrays will help to guide electrode selection. LEARNING OBJECTIVE: To understand differences in speech recognition scores postoperatively by electrode array type (precurved versus straight). DESIRED RESULT: To demonstrate a difference in hearing performance postoperatively by electrode type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. INDICATE IRB OR IACUC: Approved by the Institutional IRB (090155).

A Five-Year Update on the Profile of Adults Undergoing Cochlear Implant Evaluation and Surgery-Are We Doing Better?

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the influence of expanding indications on the profile of adults undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) at a high-volume CI center. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: 774 adults undergoing CI evaluation from August 2015 to August 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics; audiometry; speech recognition; speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ-12). RESULTS: Of 745 (96.3%) patients qualifying for implantation, 642 (86.6%) pursued surgery. Median age at evaluation was 69 years; 56.3% were men; 88.2% were Caucasian. Median distance to our center was 95 miles. The majority (51.8%) had public insurance (Medicare, Medicaid), followed by private (47.8%) and military (0.4%). Mean PTA, CNC, and AzBio in quiet and noise for the ear to be implanted were 85.2 dB HL, 15.0%, and 19.2% and 3.5%, respectively. Hybrid/EAS criteria were met by 138 (18.5%) CI candidates, and 436 (77.0%) unilateral CI recipients had aidable contralateral hearing for bimodal hearing configurations. Younger age (odds ratio [OR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-0.99) and non-Caucasian race (OR, 6.95; 95% confidence interval, 3.22-14.98) predicted candidacy. Likelihood of surgery increased for Caucasian (OR, 8.08; 95% confidence interval, 4.85-13.47) and married (OR, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-3.47) patients and decreased for those with public insurance (OR, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.69). A lower SSQ-12 score predicted both candidacy and surgery. CONCLUSION: Despite expansions in criteria, speech understanding remained extremely low at CI evaluation. Younger age and non-Caucasian race predicted candidacy, and Caucasian, married patients with private insurance and lower SSQ scores were more likely to pursue surgery.

Further Evidence for Individual Ear Consideration in Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To report speech outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) for asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) and assess the influence of contralateral hearing. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-eight adults (mean age, 70 yr) undergoing CI for AHL from 2015 to 2020. Candidacy included pure-tone average (PTA) at least 70 dB hearing level and AzBio in quiet 60% or less in the implanted ear and AzBio in quiet greater than 40% in the contralateral ear. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PTA; Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word, AzBio sentences scores; Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). RESULTS: Mean preoperative PTA and AzBio in the implanted and contralateral ears were 85.2 and 68.1 dB hearing level and 24.7% and 69.2%, respectively. Mean CNC in the implanted ear increased from 18.3% preoperatively to 44.4% ( p < 0.0001) at 6 months and 49.3% ( p < 0.0001) at 12 months. Mean AzBio in the implanted ear improved from 24.7% preoperatively to 60.3% ( p < 0.0001) at 6 months and 64.3% ( p < 0.0001) at 12 months. Patients demonstrated significant improvement in all SSQ domains at 6 and 12 months. When comparing patients with preoperative contralateral AzBio greater than 60% versus 41% to 60%, no significant differences existed in postoperative CNC scores (6-mo: 47% versus 41%, p = 0.276; 12-mo: 51% versus 47%, p = 0.543). There were no significant differences in 6-month ( p = 0.936) or 12-month ( p = 0.792) CNC scores between patients with AHL (contralateral ear AzBio >40%) and 169 unilateral CI patients meeting the traditional Medicare criteria (contralateral ear AzBio ≤40%). CONCLUSION: CI recipients with AHL derive significant speech improvements, supporting individual ear consideration for CI candidacy and patient benefit outside of current Medicare criteria.

Same-Day Patient Consultation and Cochlear Implantation: Patient Experiences and Barriers to Implementation.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of same-day cochlear implant (SDCI) evaluation and surgery in improving patient experience. PATIENTS: Adult CI candidates participated in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Education materials and communication with providers were offered via telephone, e-mail, and/or telemedicine. Patients then arrived for in-person consultation, imaging studies, and outpatient CI surgery in one visit and received a 3-month postoperative survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative hearing, referral-to-surgery time, travel burden, and patient satisfaction were included as outcome measures. RESULTS: Of 35 patients who qualified, 14 were successfully contacted regarding the same-day program: 9 underwent CI, 1 enrolled but did not ultimately meet candidacy criteria, and 4 declined because of coronavirus and/or active medical conditions and did not pursue a CI. For the nine patients who underwent SDCI, mean age was 78 years, and mean preoperative consonant-nucleus-consonant score was 16% in the implanted ear. Mean referral-to-surgery time was 103 days and, after accounting for cancellations because of coronavirus, was 52 days. Mean travel distance to institution was 234 miles. Of the seven patients who completed the follow-up survey, none felt rushed for surgery, and mean program experience was rated 8.6 out of 10. Net promoter score was positive (+72), supporting high experience favorability among patients. Barriers to program expansion included patient recruitment and education, surgery scheduling, and the coronavirus pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: No patients declined the SDCI program to pursue traditional CI evaluation, and all patients were satisfied with their experience. The SDCI program is a feasible and successful model that overcomes barriers to implantation, including travel burden, and improves access to care.